Former FBI director James Comey is ready to have his license to practise regulation revoked following false testimony given to Congress earlier this yr.
Ty Clevenger, the courageous lawyer who has labored relentlessly to get Hillary and a number of other members of her marketing campaign employees disbarred, has set his sights on Comey and filed a bar grievance in New York this week. He has accused Comey of mendacity to Congress and destroying proof within the Clinton e-mail scandal, in a transfer that would end in Comey being disbarred.
Ty Clevenger filed the grievance in New York, the place Mr. Comey was a former U.S. lawyer and is licensed to follow regulation.
Mr. Clevenger stated Mr. Comey’s testimony to Congress that he didn’t predetermine the result of the FBI’s probe into former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is belied by revelations this week that he the truth is began drafting an exoneration months earlier than even talking with Mrs. Clinton.
“Insofar as Mr. Comey gave materially false testimony to Congress, it seems that he violated Guidelines 1.zero(w), three.three(a)(1), and eight.four of the New York Guidelines of Skilled Conduct,” Mr. Clevenger wrote.
Zerohedge.com experiences: Clevenger additionally requested to resume grievances in New York towards former Legal professional Normal Loretta Lynch, saying that Comey’s declare that she tried to stress him to downplay the Clinton probe ought to topic her to scrutiny.
As chances are you’ll recall, Clevenger can be the lawyer who satisfied Maryland decide Paul Harris Jr. to order the Maryland state bar to research former Hillary aides David Kendall, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson for his or her efforts in allegedly serving to Hillary “destroy proof.”
A Maryland decide ordered the state bar to open an investigation Monday into the three legal professionals who helped former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to delete her personal emails.
Circuit Choose Paul F. Harris Jr. stated the complaints lodged towards David E. Kendall, Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson had been “egregious” and stated the state bar couldn’t brush them apart by calling them “frivolous.”
“There are allegations of destroying proof,” Choose Harris stated at a listening to Monday morning, the place he stated the state’s guidelines require the bar to conduct investigations irrespective of who raises the grievance, and may’t brush accusations apart.
“I simply assume it is a moderately straightforward resolution at this level,” he stated. “The courtroom is ordering bar counsel to research.”
So what say you? Is that this all a waste of time or are the Clintons the one ones who can perpetually keep away from punishment for his or her scandals?