Google Instruct Contractors To Suppress Alternative Media From Search

Leaked Google paperwork reveal plans by the search engine large to censor and suppress various media web sites from showing in search outcomes. 

According to paperwork obtained by Mike Cernovich, Google Inc. have instructed contractors to price articles coming from conspiracy web sites and various media as “low” in an effort to push them out of the search outcomes.

An e-mail despatched out to all contractors particularly requested that each one staff artificially price InfoWars.com as “low quality” and “untrusted”

Infowars.com stories:

Russian President Vladimir Putin, former U.S. Congressman Ron Paul and Syrian President Bashar Al Assad should not legitimate sources to quote in a information report, in accordance with leaked paperwork from a Google contractor.

In the interview, embedded from Sky News, Assad vehemently denied finishing up the chemical weapons assault for which his regime has been blamed for, and insinuated the occasion might have been a false flag assault.

Infowars additionally cited related sentiments echoed by Russian President Putin…

and even former U.S. Congressman Ron Paul.

But leaked paperwork present a Google contractor is being directed to price Infowars articles as “low to medium” no matter their content material, and lists our latest article on Assad as a major instance

“This is a news article from Infowars,” a screenshot from the contractor coaching information on ranking PQ (web page high quality) notes. “In considering the quality of any article, you should be mindful of where that article comes from. What reputation does it have, and how might that reputation affect its day-to-day coverage?”

The contractor additional outlines that an “acceptable” rankings scale vary for Infowars content material is “low to medium,” including that the “medium” ranking is “generous,” however acceptable as a result of search engine customers could also be on the lookout for various sources of knowledge.

The information subsequent makes an attempt to distinguish Infowars’ protection of Assad’s feedback from CNN’s, whom they declare “is a popular news source that covers the story with a depth and mostly straightforward reporting.”

“To compare, the Infowars article is brief and only mentions statements from sources not really typical: Putin, former Congressman Ron Paul, and Assad himself, which seem to be making the same case here that bolsters the site’s previously held perspectives, which cut against the grain, to say the least.”

Can’t have that now can we!