Congress Investigates FBI’s Ties To Spy Who Produced Fake Trump Dossier

Congress has opened an investigation into the FBI’s ties with a disgraced former British spy who provided a faux Russian file to try to deliver down Trump’s presidency. 

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassly is main an inquiry into claims that the FBI employed former MI6 spy Christopher Steele to supply unverified and salacious claims about President Trump.

In a scathing letter to FBI Director James Comey, Grassley claims that Steele was a Democrat plant tasked with stopping Trump from taking workplace.

In a Monday letter to FBI Director James Comey, Grassley requested for data pertaining to any agreements the company could have had with Christopher Steele. The MI6 agent wrote an explosive memo on behalf of Trump’s political enemies alleging that the Russians had compromising data on the president.

Comey briefed Trump on the existence of the memo in a non-public assembly in January.

Shortly after, a number of information organizations revealed the unverified allegations, which the White House denied.

In late February, The Washington Post reported that the FBI reached an settlement with Steele whereby the British spy would proceed his investigation on behalf of the bureau.

“While Trump has derided the dossier as ‘fake news’ compiled by his political opponents, the FBI’s arrangement with Steele shows that the bureau considered him credible and found his information, while unproved, to be worthy of further investigation,” the Post reported on the time.

Grassley is pushing again and demanding the FBI present data pertaining to its use of the British spy, whose salacious allegations have infuriated Trump and his allies.

“The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for President in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends,” Grassley wrote.

“It is additionally troubling that the FBI reportedly agreed to such an arrangement given that, in January of 2017, then-Director Clapper issued a statement stating that ‘the [intelligence community] has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions.’”

In his letter, Grassley asks for all data concerning Steele’s investigation, particulars of the settlement between the FBI and Steele, the FBI’s insurance policies for utilizing exterior investigators, and whether or not the bureau has relied on any of the knowledge Steele has supplied in looking for warrants.