A haunting new video has surfaced that includes murdered DNC whistleblower Seth Rich elevating the alarm about election fraud – only one 12 months earlier than his dying.
In a video posted on YouTube on Thursday, Rich questioned the integrity of ballots earlier than a panel of election-commission officers throughout the 2015 Election Data Summit.
“I believe a few of you had spoken about provisional ballots and rejected ballots – I assume we have now checked out, as an out of doors practitioner with a vested curiosity in coaching our voters, how will we get higher entry to knowledge that tells us why ballots are rejected – why ballots are forged as provisional – in order that we are able to analyze that and develop higher coaching guides?”
Rich, who labored because the voter-expansion knowledge director on the DNC for 2 years, was killed in 2016 in a taking pictures not removed from his Washington residence. His murder case seems to be rising chilly, because the Washington police keep that he was killed throughout a botched theft, regardless of the very fact he was discovered along with his pockets in his pocket, bank cards, cellphone, necklace and different valuables in his possession.
But WikiLeaks started releasing paperwork – DNC emails – 12 days after Rich’s homicide that will reveal a plot throughout the Democratic Party to make sure Hillary Clinton could be nominated over Sen. Bernie Sanders.
And WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange insinuated the next month, in August 2016, that the slain DNC staffer was considered one of his sources and insisted that Rich’s homicide had nothing to do with a theft.
“Our whistleblowers go to significant efforts to get us material, and often very significant risks as a 27-year-old that works for the DNC who was shot in the back – murdered just two weeks ago for unknown reasons as he was walking down the street in Washington,” Assange mentioned in an interview final August.
“We have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States and that our sources are – our sources face serious risks. That is why they come to us, so that we can protect their anonymity,” he continued.
WikiLeaks issued a $20,000 reward for data resulting in conviction for the homicide of Rich final August.
Kim Dotcom, a tech mogul with shut ties to WikiLeaks, has alleged Rich was the supply of the leaked DNC emails and claimed that he, Kim Dotcom, was a part of an operation together with Rich to get stolen DNC emails to WikiLeaks.
Last week, Dotcom’s legal professionals wrote a letter to the DOJ asking for him to be allowed to testify about Seth Rich’s homicide with out being detained. The tech entrepreneur from New Zealand faces extradition to the U.S. on a litany of unrelated fees, together with copyright infringement and cash laundering.
Dotcom claims Rich first contacted him on-line in 2014, utilizing the Internet moniker “Panda” – recognized to be the DNC staffer’s favourite animal. He has supplied three e mail addresses that he says belonged to Rich: Seth.email@example.com, Panda4Progress@gmail.com and Pandas4Bernie@gmail.com. The addresses pointed to social media and Reddit accounts that appeared to again up the claims that he might have been a disgruntled Sanders supporter.
Rich’s inquiries to the election fee befell months earlier than the New York City’s Board of Elections stripped 126,000 Democratic Party voters from the rolls. The Bernie Sanders’ marketing campaign referred to as reviews of the voting irregularities within the state “a disgrace.”
The leak of DNC paperwork, which evidenced how some DNC officers sought to undermine Sanders within the celebration main, prompted disgruntled Sanders supporters to file class-action lawsuits towards the Democratic National Committee and former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman for rigging the election.
Harvard regulation professional Jared Beck, who filed the lawsuit, Wilding et al vs. DNC Services Corporation and Deborah “Debbie” Wasserman-Schultz, on behalf of residents of 45 states towards the DNC and its former chairwoman, is demanding the celebration repay people and Sanders supporters for contributions made throughout the election, alleging misappropriation of funds.
“If we can’t trust the two political parties to run an election in a fair manner, who can we trust?” Beck informed Fox News.
Article 5, Section four of the Democratic Party constitution specifies that it’ll function with whole impartiality throughout Democratic Party primaries. DNC lawyer Bruce Spiva argued throughout an April 25 listening to that the promise was non-binding and the celebration just isn’t certain by pledges of equity.
“We could have voluntarily decided that, ‘Look, we’re gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way.’ That’s not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right,” Spiva asserted. “And there’s no right to not have your candidate disadvantaged or have another candidate advantaged. There’s no contractual obligation here.”
The regulation agency representing Sanders supporters within the class-action lawsuit towards DNC and Wasserman Schultz filed a discover to the United States federal court docket on June 1, alleging the workplace of Wasserman Schultz referred to as the regulation agency inquiring concerning the case utilizing a “robotic and genderless” voice-changing gadget – however she reportedly forgot to disable caller ID.